2 |
Polarity Items in Basque. Experimental evidence for their existential reading
|
|
|
|
In: Natural Language & Linguistic Theory ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03506632 ; Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 2021, ⟨10.1007/s11049-021-09513-2⟩ (2021)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
3 |
Polarity Items in Basque. Experimental evidence for their existential reading
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Editorial : What Are (Un)Acceptability and (Un)Grammaticality? How Do They Relate to One Another and to Interpretation?
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
7 |
Relating (Un)acceptability to Interpretation. Experimental Investigations on Negation
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
8 |
Language dominance affects bilingual performance and processing outcomes in adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
9 |
Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
The Lexical Category of Adjective : Challenging the Traditional Notion
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
Language Dominance Affects Bilingual Performance and Processing Outcomes in Adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
Language dominance affects early bilingual performance and processing outcomes in adulthood
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
13 |
A Minimalist Analysis of Negative Concord in Northern Peninsular Spanish
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
African American Vernacular English : a representation of a non-mainstream variety of English in Kathryn Stockett's The Help
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
16 |
A Study on Conversion : Morphology-Syntax Boundary and Category Underspecification
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
Neither, (n)or nothing and hardly in negative concord constructions in traditional dialects of British English.
|
|
|
|
In: Sintagma: revista de lingüística; 2015: Vol.: 27; p. 7-24 (2016)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Double Negation in a Negative Concord language: An experimental investigation
|
|
|
|
In: ISSN: 0024-3841 ; Lingua ; https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01158576 ; Lingua, Elsevier, 2015, 163, pp.75-107. ⟨10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.012⟩ (2015)
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
Is there a universal answering strategy for rejecting negative propositions? Typological evidence on the use of prosody and gesture
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
Previous research has proposed that languages diverge with respect to how their speakers confirm and contradict negative questions. Taking into account the classification between truth-based and polarity-based languages, this paper is mainly concerned with the expression of REJECT (a semantic operation that signals a contradiction move with respect to the common ground, along Krifka's lines) in two languages belonging to two typologically distinct answering systems, namely Catalan (polarity-based) and Russian (a mixed system using polarity-based, truth-based, and echoic strategies). This investigation has two goals. First, to assess empirically the relevance of prosodic and gestural patterns in the interpretation of confirming and rejecting responses to negative polar questions. Second, to test the claim that in fact speakers resort to strikingly similar universal strategies at the time of expressing rejecting answers to discourse accessible negative assertions and negative polar questions, namely the use of linguistic units that encode REJECT in combination with ASSERT. The results of our investigation support the existence of a universal answering system for rejecting negative polar questions that integrates lexical and syntactic strategies with prosodic and gestural patterns, and instantiate the REJECT and ASSERT operators. We will also discuss the implications these results have for the truth-based vs. polarity-based taxonomy.
|
|
Keyword:
Gesture; Polarity-based answering systems; Prosody; REJECT; Truth-based answering systems
|
|
URL: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/254413 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00899
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
20 |
Is there a universal answering strategy for rejecting negative propositions? Typological evidence on the use of prosody and gesture
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|